Skip to content
LinguaCommons
← Notation Systems

ToBI (Tones and Break Indices)

ToBI — Tones and Break Indices — is not a phonetic alphabet. It is a system for transcribing intonation and prosody: the melody of speech, and how tightly words are joined together. It was created by speech scientists in the early 1990s to give prosody the kind of shared standard that the IPA gives to segments, so that prosodically labelled speech databases could be exchanged between research sites. The original design target was English, specifically Mainstream American English.12

The tiers

A ToBI annotation is layered over a recording as parallel tiers, time-aligned to the waveform and pitch track:1

TierWhat it records
Tone tierpitch events as phonological labels: pitch accents (H*, L*, L+H*…), phrase accents (H-, L-), and boundary tones (H%, L%)
Break-index tierthe perceived strength of the juncture between each pair of words, on a 0–4 scale
Word tierthe orthographic words, giving the transcription its time anchors
Miscellaneous tiercomments, disfluencies, and events that don't belong on the other tiers

Two points trip people up. Tone labels like H* are phonological categories, not raw fundamental-frequency (F0) values — they describe how a pitch movement functions, not its exact hertz. And break indices are not punctuation: a break index of 4 marks a full intonational-phrase boundary as heard, which may or may not line up with where a comma would go.1

One name, two scopes

"ToBI" refers to two different things. In its narrow sense it is the original English (MAE_ToBI) system. In its broad sense it is a framework — a set of design principles for building a prosodic transcription system for a particular language. The Ohio State guidelines are explicit that the original ToBI was developed for major varieties of English and was not intended to cover other languages, though its principles can be adapted. That adaptation has produced a whole family of language-specific systems.13

SystemLanguage / variety
MAE_ToBIMainstream American English (the original)
GToBIGerman
K-ToBIKorean (splits the tone tier into phonological and phonetic tone tiers)
Sp_ToBISpanish
J_ToBIJapanese (X-JToBI)

The lesson for anyone labelling data: you cannot take English ToBI labels and apply them to another language. You need that language's ToBI system, whose inventory of tones and break conventions may differ — K-ToBI, for instance, uses five minimal tiers and separates phonological from phonetic tone.3

Reliability and tools

ToBI was validated with an inter-transcriber reliability study — the 1992 report describes twenty transcribers making some 20,000 labelling decisions and reports high agreement, which is what let ToBI serve as a shared standard rather than one lab's private notation. In practice, ToBI tiers are annotated in Praat TextGrids (or Emu, or older xwaves-style tools), which is where prosody transcription meets the Praat workflow LinguaCommons audio work uses.12

Errors to avoid

  • Calling ToBI an alphabet — it is a prosodic annotation system, layered over speech in tiers.1
  • Applying English ToBI labels to another language instead of using that language's ToBI system.13
  • Reading tone labels (H*, L-) as raw F0 measurements rather than phonological categories.1
  • Treating break indices as punctuation rather than perceived juncture strength.1
  • Reusing the Ohio State training materials without checking their licence.1

Learn more

Notes & Bibliography

  1. Beckman, Mary E., & Gayle Ayers Elam. Guidelines for ToBI Labelling, Version 3, March 1997. Ohio State University. Core guide: ToBI = Tones and Break Indices; tone/break-index/word/miscellaneous tiers; labels are phonological not raw F0; break indices are perceived juncture; original ToBI was for English and not intended to cover other languages; training-material copyright. [source]
  2. Silverman, Kim, Mary Beckman, John Pitrelli, Mori Ostendorf, Colin Wightman, Patti Price, Janet Pierrehumbert, & Julia Hirschberg. "TOBI: A Standard for Labeling English Prosody." ICSLP 1992 — motivation (no IPA-equivalent standard for prosody existed); inter-transcriber reliability study (twenty transcribers, ~20,000 decisions, high agreement). [source]
  3. "ToBI" as broad framework: language-specific systems (GToBI, K-ToBI, Sp_ToBI, J_ToBI) adapt the architecture — e.g. K-ToBI splits the tone tier into phonological and phonetic tiers and uses five minimal tiers. Evidence that English labels cannot be transferred directly to other languages. [source]